As Avatar gets closer to release, the James Cameron interviews begin to roll in. Cameron is one of those guys who I wish I had just 1% of their drive to get my shit together and make something of myself. He’s a hardcore man, but if one is gonna be responsible for the type of work Cameron puts out, its a necessity to be nothing less. I plan on catching this a few times, hopefully in 3-D each outing. Hit me up if you want in on some repeat (or initial) screening action. You know i’m down!
First up is a snippet from the (shorter) Vanity Fair interview:
Yeah, what is the good part?Tickets sell $15 in 3-D and $12 in 2-D, so movies—whether it’s Avatar or any other movie—are still the best value for your money, and the ratio of the bargain goes up the higher the budget of the film, which is why Hollywood has become a blockbuster business. The independent business is not a great business—you have a few breakout films every year that make some money with, but the rest … it’s not a business for these studios anymore, unfortunately, which is sad, it’s a sad thing. The reality is the type of film I make is the type of film that’s keeping Hollywood alive in rough times.
How do you not let this technology—which everyone is already talking about—overwhelm the actual movie?
Well you don’t. I mean people talked about the scale of the sets on Titanic, and went on endlessly about the budget and how many lights we used and how the actors were all freezing in the water—which, by the way was 82 degrees—and how our safety record was horrific and we were slaughtering people left and right. And then the second people saw the movie, all that stuff went away. Or it became a footnote to the story. Because the story was the story. And right now people don’t have an actor story to tell, other than the discovery of Sam and how Zoe is like the ‘it’ Sci-Fi girl of the year, whatever that is, but the big story right now is the technology. I think that’s going to evaporate the second people see the film, because the average person doesn’t care how it’s done—they just care that it looks the way it does, and that it works the way it does, and that it works on their emotions the way it does. Will the 3-D inform the experience? Yeah absolutely, I think if you see the film in 3-D you’ll be 10 percent more impressed. The film plays as well in 2-D. It’s just, pay a couple of extra bucks and you get a little more sense of being there.
I paid $100 for a ticket to the Mary Poppins musical—I’ll pay $15.
Why would you do that?
- James Cameron interview via Vanity Fair
This is from the longer Wired story with a few Cameron quotes sprinkled about:
This was work that would never appear onscreen, but Cameron loved it. He brought in more people, hiring an expert in astrophysics, a music professor, and an archaeologist. They calculated Pandora’s atmospheric density and established a tripartite scale structure for the alien music. When one of the experts brought in the Star Wars Encyclopedia, Cameron glanced at it and said, “We’ll do better.”Eventually, a team of writers and editors compiled all this information into a 350-page manual dubbed Pandorapedia. It documents the science and culture of the imaginary planet, and, as much as anything, it represents the fully realized world Cameron has created. For fans who want to delve deeper, parts of Pandorapedia will be available online this winter.
- James Cameron interview via Wired.com
This issue just came over the weekend. I can’t wait to dive into this. The Kennedy’s? “Meaning of Life” issue? Oh hellz yeah!*
*Could do without the less than favorable review of Bad Lieutenant.
Midwives, collaborators, co-authors, co-writers, writers-for-hire, book doctors, ghosts—call them what you will—give aid and adjectives to athletes, politicians, movie stars, moguls, miscreants and the briefly famous who are asked to tell their stories and don’t know how. “Often, when a celebrity tries to write the book himself, he’ll be on page 200 and he’s still only 12 years old,” said Dan Strone, CEO of Trident Media Group, a literary agency.
I highly suggest checking out this article on “Ghostwriters” and the like. It looks long, but it’s a quick read. A very insightful look into something most people don’t think about, but after you read, it becomes very layered. (Different options with various reasoning.)
And here’s my end: I put on a coat and tie, grab a stray bottle of wine, maybe a bag of pistachios, stuff myself in an overcoat, gather the people around me, and go to my party, a blessed constant in a season that mostly means loss to me these days. Mine in that I can rely on it. Mine because my friends give it to me. I thank them because the best present of all is the one you don’t have to wish for.
If you plan to throw some sort of Holiday party, I implore you to read Esquire’s article on the proper way to handle such an event. Even discounting the whole “kids” part of it, Chiarella paints a tiny, intimate picture of past & future parties, that is more about enjoying the company of your friends because, well, they’re your friends.
So photographer Neil Krug & model Joni Harbeck worked on a little project together called the Pulp Art Book. You can get a decent look at some of its contents if you click on over to their site. As part of their badassness, they did this little trailer for the book that is all sorts of excellent. Big ups to Matthew Jacob for the heads up.
Heads up! January Jones is on the cover of the latest issue of GQ. It’s weird, because it seems like you get pretty intimate with her as she starts drinking mid-article, however, when it’s over, it feels like you didn’t really learn much about her, if anything at all. The photos are by Terry Richardson (ugh) and story by Mark Kirby. I’m an Esquire man, so I’m not familiar with GQ’s modus operandi nor Kirby, so I can’t tell you if this result from an article is par for the course with him. Still you do get some facts about whom she’s dated, the amount of beer she’s drank in one sitting, her formal training (or lack thereof), how she got her name, what kind of music she listens to, and much more.
January is just as friendly and funny this morning as the night before, but without the weird enforced intimacy of the flight—the close seats, the drinks, the dim lights—our meeting feels businesslike. For the first time, I can see why, in other interviews, she often comes off as distant: the aloof pretty girl, unfailingly polite but also self-protecting, a little more Betty Draper than the woman who, after her fifth round last night, picked up the digital recorder and announced: “Dear men of America, I like beer, I like football. I’m probably the most interesting girl you’ll ever meet.”
- Via GQ
Jake Gyllenhaal decided to give us a look into the mind of Natalie Portman for the September Issue of Interview Magazine. Actually, at certain points, it seems like we find out more about him, than her. Go check out the rest and while you’re at it, check out Liana’s stuff on the show Glee, if you’re into that sort of business.
GYLLENHAAL: What song best describes your current state?
PORTMAN: My current state … I’m trying to think of a song that feels like sleepwalking. [laughs] I don’t know. I’ve mostly been listening to dirty rap lately. That’s sort of my scene.
GYLLENHAAL: Your affection for dirty rap is something that people really don’t know about you, which I think is fascinating. You do incredible things for the world, and then you listen to just completely obscene hip-hop music.
PORTMAN: Really, really obscene hip-hop. I love it so much. It makes me laugh and then it makes me want to dance. Those are like my two favorite things, so combined … I’ve been listening a lot lately to “Wait (The Whisper Song)” by the Ying Yang Twins, where the lyrics are like, “Wait ’til you see my dick”—which is just amazing because it’s whispered. [whispers] “Wait ’til you see my dick … ” [laughs] Crazy. So I just listen to it like I’m a five-year-old, like, “Oh my god! I can’t believe he just said that!”
GYLLENHAAL: It’s interesting that you think the lyric “Wait ’til you see my dick” describes your current state. I think people are learning more about you right now then they ever have in an interview. I’m proud of that.
- Via Interview Magazine